The Effect of Mixed-age Game Activities on Preschool Children's Prosocial Behavior

Authors

  • Jingyuan Zhang Faculty Of Education, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin,300000, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/e3q2cq19

Keywords:

Preschool children; Mixed-age game activities; prosocial behaviour.

Abstract

This study focuses on the impact of mixed-age play activities on preschool children's prosocial behaviors. In response to the limitations of same-age grouping and the challenges in children's social development, it is supported by Vygotsky's "Zone of Proximal Development" and Bandura's social learning theory. Through literature review and case analysis, it compares the differences between same-age and mixed-age play. The research finds that mixed-age play enhances children's self-efficacy in prosocial behaviors through mixed-age feedback, promotes the acquisition of prosocial cultural tools, and facilitates self-monitoring and adjustment of prosocial behaviors, thus having unique value in fostering prosocial behaviors. Four implementation strategies are proposed: designing activities based on stratified goals and cooperative tasks, establishing a role guidance mechanism that leverages the leadership of older children and the empowerment of younger ones, creating a safe and inclusive interactive environment, and adopting a process-oriented growth evaluation. The study has limitations, such as a single sample and not considering external interference factors. Future research should be optimized by expanding the sample and combining mixed research methods to provide references for mixed-age play practices in kindergartens and the cultivation of prosocial behaviors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Shabani, K., Khatib, M., & Ebadi, S. Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development: Instructional Implications and Teachers’ Professional Development. English Language Teaching, 2010, 3(4), 237–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n4p237

[2] McLeod, S. Albert Bandura’s Social Learning Theory. Retrieved from Simply Psychology website: https://www.simplypsychology.org/bandura.html,2025b, March 18

[3] Gray, P. The Special Value of Children’s Age-Mixed Play. American Journal of Play, 2011, 3(4), 500–522.

[4] Shi Yanbin. Research on Mixed-Age Activities for Constructing Cooperative Learning Experiences in Young Children Journal of Fujian Institute of Education, 2020, 21 (03), 111-112.

[5] ZhuangXiaoQing. Outdoor mixed-age games improve the children's development cooperation ability. Preschool education research, 2021, (6), 85-88.

[6] Padilla-Walker, L., & Carlo, G. The study of prosocial development: Past, present and future. In L. Padilla-Walker & G. Carlo (Eds.), Prosocial development: A multidimensional approach (pp. 3–16). Oxford University Press, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199964772.003.0001

[7] Kotaman, H., & Aslan, M. Young children’s trust and sharing decisions. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 2024, 18(1), 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-024-00128-9

[8] Bandura, A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 1982, 37(2), 122–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122

[9] Veraksa, N., & Veraksa, A. LEV VYGOTSKY’S CULTURAL- HISTORICAL THEORY OF DEVELOPMENT AND THE PROBLEM OF MENTAL TOOLS, 2018.

[10] Bandura, A., Grusec, J. E., & Menlove, F. L. Some social determinants of self-monitoring reinforcement systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 5(4), 449–455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024392

Downloads

Published

05-02-2026