The Contradictions Between the Learning Mechanism of Llms and L2 Learners' Knowledge Construction Process and Its Influence on SLA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ze7spk11Keywords:
Large Language Models, Second Language Acquisition, Computational Learning.Abstract
In recent years, Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved great success, with many L2 learners and educational institutions beginning to explore the utilization of LLMs in facilitating Second Language Acquisition (SLA). However, the integration of LLMs in the SLA framework comes along with numerous risks. Many recent studies have compared the different learning mechanisms of LLMs and L2 learners from diverse perspectives, but few of them linked such differences with the influence of LLMs on SLA. Utilizing the literature review method, this article mainly draws on Processability Theory (PT) and Complex Dynamic Systems Theory (CDST) and pays special attention to the chatbot in an oral English practicing scenario. By reflecting and comparing the learning mechanisms of LLMs and L2 learners, this article sheds light on the influence of their different learning mechanisms on SLA and identifies several challenges related to safety, ethics, and society. To handle these challenges and promote the effective utilization of LLMs among teachers and students, this article provides the following recommendations: upgrading models, improving transparency, adopting a human-centered approach, enhancing users' capacity, and strengthening government supervision, etc.
Downloads
References
[1] Du J, & Daniel B K. Transforming language education: A systematic review of AI-powered chatbots for English as a foreign language speaking practice. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2024, 6: 100230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100230
[2] Pienemann M. Developmental dynamics in L1 and L2 acquisition: Processability theory and generative entrenchment. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1998, 1(1): 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728998000017
[3] Han Z, Kang E Y, & Sok S. The complexity epistemology and ontology in second language acquisition: A critical review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2023, 45(5): 1388-1412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000420
[4] van Hell J G. The neurocognitive underpinnings of second language processing: Knowledge gains from the past and future outlook: A response to open peer commentaries. Language Learning, 2023, 73(S2): 172-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12618
[5] Qiao C. Factors influencing second language learning based on the research of Lightbown and Spada. Frontiers in Psychology, 2024, 15: 1347691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1347691
[6] Kumar P. Large language models (LLMs): Survey, technical frameworks, and future challenges. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2024, 57(10): 260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10888-y
[7] Radford A, Wu J, Child R, Luan D, Amodei D, & Sutskever I. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI Blog, 2019.
[8] Bender E M, & Koller A. Climbing towards NLU: On meaning, form, and understanding in the age of data. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020: 5185-5198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.463
[9] Mitchell M, & Krakauer D C. The debate over understanding in AI's large language models. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2023, 120(13): e2215907120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2215907120
[10] Xu H, Gan W, Qi Z, Wu J, & Yu P S. Large language models for education: A survey. arXiv, 2024, arXiv:2405.13001.
[11] Yan L, Sha L, Zhao L, Li Y, Martinez-Maldonado, R., Chen, G., Li, X., Jin, Y., & Gašević, D. Practical and ethical challenges of large language models in education: A systematic scoping review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2024, 55: 90-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13370
[12] Kong S C, Yang Y, & Hou C. Examining teachers' behavioural intention of using generative artificial intelligence tools for teaching and learning based on the extended technology acceptance model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2024, 7: 100328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100328
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







