The Influence of Interlanguage on Language Understanding and Cognitive Processes in Second Language Acquisition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/7z8paa19Keywords:
Interlanguage, Language Comprehension, Cognitive Process.Abstract
The impact of interlanguage on second language acquisition has garnered widespread attention, yet its mechanisms and effects remain insufficiently analyzed. This paper examines the mechanisms by which interlanguage influences language comprehension and cognitive processes, analyzing phonetics, word order, pragmatics, and learners' language internalization in Chinese-English bilingualism. The findings reveal that interlanguage negatively affects short-term language comprehension and long-term cognitive processes for Chinese native speakers learning English as a second language, including logical fallacies and psychological barriers such as rigid thinking, daily communicative psychological stress, and pragmatic misconceptions. Based on these findings, the paper proposes the following teaching and learning recommendations: First, teachers should accurately assess the causes of interlanguage emergence in learners. Second, educators can help students identify native language phonetic interference, cultivate effective listening and speaking habits, and utilize recording corrections and online educational resources to support learning. Third, teachers should emphasize the role of cultural cognition in second language acquisition. Finally, individual learners need to establish personal spaces for practicing the second language and engage in language acquisition within the context of cultural cognition.
Downloads
References
[1] Selinker, Larry. Interlanguage. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 1972, 10: 209-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209
[2] Liu X. Cultural Cognition and Pragmatic Interaction: Analysis of Word Order Errors in Chinese Interlanguage for International Students.. Chinese Character Culture, 2025, (19): 102-104.
[3] Zhao T. Research on the Acquisition of Chinese Interlanguage Discourse Based on the Theory of Small Sentence Complex. Beijing Foreign Studies University, 2025.
[4] Larsen-Freeman D. Another step to be taken–Rethinking the end point of the interlanguage continuum. Interlanguage. John Benjamins, 2014: 203-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.39.11ch9
[5] NiesTorowicz T. The Phenomenon of Interlanguage in the Process of Second Language Acquisition. Logopedia, 43: 31-39.
[6] Fan S. Negative Transfer of Chinese English Interlanguage in Second Language Acquisition. Modern Linguistics, 2025, 13 (6): 124-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2025.136573
[7] Lindes P, Laird J E. Toward integrating cognitive linguistics and cognitive language processing. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (ICCM). 2016.
[8] Bender A, Rothe-Wulf A, Hüther L, et al. Moving forward in space and time: how strong is the conceptual link between spatial and temporal frames of reference? Frontiers in Psychology, 2012, 3: 486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00486
[9] Gas S. Language transfer and universal grammatical relations. Language learning, 1979, 29(2): 327-344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1979.tb01073.x
[10] Hu Z. Editor in Chief, Linguistics Course. Peking University Press, 2001
[11] Bian Z, Lu H, Wan J. Multimodal Approaches to Second Language Acquisition in the Digital Age. SHS Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences, 2025, 220: 04025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202522004025
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







