The Comparison of Psychological Perspectives and Traditional Chinese Philosophical Stances
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/emqt4542Keywords:
Cross-cultural psychology, Traditional Chinese philosophy, Holism vs. atomism, Dialectical thinking, Confucian ethics, Daoist naturalism, Buddhist theory of human nature.Abstract
This study investigates the integration of modern psychology with traditional Chinese philosophy to develop a culturally grounded psychological framework. Traditional Chinese philosophy, rooted in holistic and dialectical thinking as well as profound insights into human nature and the mind, offers valuable perspectives to address key challenges in contemporary psychology, such as its weak cultural foundations and fragmented theoretical landscape. The paper explores psychological ideas within Confucian ethics, which emphasize social harmony and moral development; Daoist naturalism, which advocates alignment with the natural order; and Buddhist conceptions of human nature, which reveal the depth and complexity of inner experience. It also examines how Western psychology has drawn upon Chinese philosophical concepts, reflecting a growing cross-cultural exchange. Drawing on methodologies from cross-cultural psychology, the study proposes a comparative paradigm that integrates cognitive, methodological, and ethical dimensions, aiming to foster a more inclusive, culturally informed understanding of psychological phenomena. This approach highlights the importance of cultural context in shaping psychological theory and practice in an increasingly globalized world.
Downloads
References
[1] SI, X. F., & SONG, X. F. (2019). Differences in Self-Perception between Chinese and Western Cultures. Overseas Digest (Academic Edition), 10, 8-10.
[2] SU, F. R., & GUO, S. P. (2013). Cross-Cultural Reflection on the Structure of Chinese Spirituality: A Confucian Perspective. Journal of Gannan Normal University.
[3] ZHANG, R. H., LIN, Y. Z., & HUANG, J. L. (2014). The Relationship between New Trends in Western Wisdom Research and Zhong-Yong Thinking. Chinese Journal of Social Psychology Review, 8, 45-58.
[4] LIANG, Y. F., & XIE, T. (2021). Authentic Self in Eastern and Western Cultures: A Relational Perspective. Advances in Psychological Science, 29(5), 894-905.
[5] GAO, X. M. (2014). Chinese Philosophy’s Authentic Philosophy of Mind. Guizhou Social Sciences, 5, 4-9.
[6] WEN, H. M. (2023). Humans as Intentionally Creative Beings: Confucian Philosophical and Cultural Psychology. Confucius Studies.
[7] SHEN, X. W. (2022). Hermeneutics: The Construction Path and Prospect of Psychotherapy Theory. Medicine & Philosophy, 43(3), 38-43.
[8] HOU, Y. B. (2007). Research Progress in Thinking Styles from Cultural Psychology. Advances in Psychological Science, 15(2), 211-216.
[9] MARKUS, H. R., & KITAYAMA, S. (1991). Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253.
[10] KOHLBERG, L., & HIGGINS, A. (1987). School Democracy and Social Interaction. In Lawrence Kohlberg: Consensus and Controversy (pp. 305-320). Routledge.
[11] Johnson, R. (2018). Dialectical Thinking in Chinese Philosophy. Comparative Philosophy, 9(2), 78-89.
[12] Kim, H. (2020). Cognitive Patterns in Chinese and Western Cultures. Cross-Cultural Research, 54(3), 67-78.
[13] Kim, H. (2021). Complementarity of Holism and Atomism. Journal of Cognitive Science, 22(4), 90-101.
[14] Lee, M. (2021). Dialectical Thinking and Yin-Yang Transformation. Journal of Asian Philosophy, 31(2), 89-100.
[15] Lee, M. (2022). Synergistic Effects of Moral and Aesthetic Training. Ethics and Aesthetics Review, 10(3), 78-89.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







