A Deep-Dive into Consumer Motivations and IMC Strategy Development for Ready-to-Drink Cocktails: A Case Study of High Noon Tequila
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/5k3f8c12Keywords:
Ready-to-Drink Cocktails; Consumer Motivation; Self-Determination Theory; Symbolic Consumption; Integrated Marketing Communications; Brand Authenticity.Abstract
The global Ready-to-Drink cocktail market is characterized by rapid growth and intense functional homogenization, pushing brands to seek differentiation beyond product attributes. This qualitative case study explores the underlying psychological, emotional, and cultural motivations driving consumer preference for High Noon Tequila within this competitive landscape. Through in-depth interviews with six regular consumers and a thematic analysis, the study identifies four core motivational themes: the use of the brand as a symbol for group belonging, the perception of its authenticity enabling a “smart choice” identity, its role in facilitating contextualized effortless sophistication, and its delivery of a controlled pleasurable release. Interpreted through Symbolic Consumption and Self-Determination Theory, these findings are synthesized into a central consumer insight: High Noon Tequila functions as a “Sanctioned Transition Ritual,” allowing consumers to legitimately shift from daily responsibilities to a valued leisure identity. Ultimately, the study translates this foundational insight into a proposed Integrated Marketing Communications campaign, “The Sanctioned Shift,” demonstrating how deep consumer understanding can forge a meaningful competitive advantage by addressing fundamental psychological needs.
Downloads
References
[1] Grand View Research. (2025). Ready-to-Drink Cocktails Market (2025 - 2030). https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/ready-to-drink-cocktails-market.
[2] BevSource. (2023). Convenience Meets Mixology: Unveiling the Latest Trends in Ready-to-Drink Cocktails. https://www.bevsource.com/news/latest-rtd-cocktail-trends?utm_source.
[3] ReAnIn. (2025). Ready-to-drink (RTD) Spirits Market. https://www.reanin.com/reports/ready-to-drink-spirits-market?utm_source.
[4] Meegahapola, L., Labhart, F., Phan, T. T., & Gatica-Perez, D. (2021). Examining the social context of alcohol drinking in young adults with smartphone sensing. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 5(3), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3478126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3478126
[5] Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of consumer research, 9(2), 132-140. https://doi.org/10.1086/208906.
[6] Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of consumer research, 15(2), 139-168. https://doi.org/10.1086/209154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/209154
[7] Batra, R., & Ahtola, O. T. (1991). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Marketing letters, 2(2), 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00436035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00436035
[8] McCracken, G. (1986). Culture and consumption: A theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods. Journal of consumer research, 13(1), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.1086/209048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/209048
[9] Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), 60-71. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.37.1.60.18718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.37.1.60.18718
[10] Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of consumer research, 9(2), 132-140. https://doi.org/10.1086/208906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/208906
[11] Thomson, M., MacInnis, D. J., & Whan Park, C. (2005). The ties that bind: Measuring the strength of consumers’ emotional attachments to brands. Journal of consumer psychology, 15(1), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1501_10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1501_10
[12] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
[13] Schultz, D. E. (1992). Integrated Marketing Communications. Journal of Promotion Management, 1(1), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1300/J057v01n01_07. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J057v01n01_07
[14] Cooper, M. L. (1994). Motivations for alcohol use among adolescents: Development and validation of a four-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 6(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.2.117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.2.117
[15] Francis, T., & Hoefel, F. (2018). “True Gen”: Generation Z and its implications for companies. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/true-gen-generation-z-and-its-implications-for-companies.
[16] Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry And Research Design Choosing Among Five Approaches. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data.
[17] Schwandt, T. A. (2014). The Sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry. Sage publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483398969
[18] Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
[19] Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
[20] Patton, M. (2015) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 4th Edition, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
[21] Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
[22] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[23] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
[24] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
[25] Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, 289-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
[26] Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
