How Successfully Can Laying Out Information in Distinct Designs Induce People to Utilize Chunking and Linking Memory?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/ttyye246Keywords:
Mnemonic devices; Chunking; Linking memory; Short-term memory; Layout design; Cognitive load; Adolescents.Abstract
This study investigates whether specific design layouts of mnemonic devices can enhance short-term memory performance by inducing the use of chunking and linking memory techniques. While prior research has demonstrated the effectiveness of mnemonic devices in improving memory outcomes, little attention has been paid to how specific visual layouts influence the application of these techniques, particularly among teenagers. Focusing on participants aged 13 to 19, this study adopts a “stealth training” approach, encouraging the development of memory strategies through design without explicit instruction. Using Psytoolkit, participants were randomly assigned to three stimulus conditions—chunking, linking memory, and random natural chunking—and asked to memorize word lists across three experimental blocks. Memory performance was assessed through response time and accuracy, analyzed using linear mixed-effects models to account for imbalanced conditions and experimental fatigue. The results indicate that chunking layouts produced the most effective short-term memory performance, while linking memory resulted in slower response times after controlling for fatigue effects, likely due to increased cognitive load. Although participants did not consistently report intentional use of the introduced techniques, the findings suggest that design layouts can influence memory outcomes independently of conscious strategy use. Overall, this study highlights the importance of layout design in mnemonic devices and suggests practical implications for educational contexts, particularly in supporting teenagers’ memory processes through implicit instructional design.
Downloads
References
[1] Cowan, N. (2014). Working Memory Underpins Cognitive Development, Learning, and Education. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 197–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9246-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9246-y
[2] Norris, D. (2017). Short-term memory and long-term memory are still different. Psychological Bulletin, 143(9), 992–1009. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000108
[3] Cowan, N. (2008). What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? Progress in Brain Research, 169, 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(07)00020-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(07)00020-9
[4] Jurowski, K., Jurowska, A., & Krzeczkowska, M. (2015). Comprehensive review of mnemonic devices and their applications: State of the art. http://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/handle/item/18737.
[5] What Is Chunking, and How Can It Improve Memory? (2024, October 22). Coursera. https://www.coursera.org/articles/chunking.
[6] Bellezza, F. S. (1981). Mnemonic Devices: Classification, Characteristics, and Criteria. Review of Educational Research, 51(2), 247–275. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543051002247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543051002247
[7] Cioca, L.-I., & Nerișanu, R. A. (2020). Enhancing Creativity: Using Visual Mnemonic Devices in the Teaching Process in Order to Develop Creativity in Students. Sustainability, 12(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051985
[8] Levin, M. E., & Levin, J. R. (1990). Scientific Mnemonomies: Methods for Maximizing More Than Memory. American Educational Research Journal, 27(2), 301–321. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312027002301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312027002301
[9] Bellezza, F. S., & Reddy, B. G. (1978). Mnemonic devices and natural memory. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11(5), 277–280. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03336829. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03336829
[10] Murman, D. L. (2015). The Impact of Age on Cognition. Seminars in Hearing, 36(3), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1555115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1555115
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







